Homework #4 TCP/IP Vulnerability Analysis Solution

$35.00 $24.00

1    Overview   The learning objective of this homework is for students to gain the first-hand experience on the vulnera- bilities of TCP/IP protocols, as well as on attacks against these vulnerabilities. The vulnerabilities in the TCP/IP protocols represent a special genre of vulnerabilities in protocol designs and implementations; they provide an invaluable lesson as…

You’ll get a: . zip file solution

 

 
Categorys:

Description

5/5 – (2 votes)

1    Overview

 

The learning objective of this homework is for students to gain the first-hand experience on the vulnera- bilities of TCP/IP protocols, as well as on attacks against these vulnerabilities. The vulnerabilities in the TCP/IP protocols represent a special genre of vulnerabilities in protocol designs and implementations; they provide an invaluable lesson as to why security should be designed in from the beginning, rather than being added as an afterthought. Moreover, studying these vulnerabilities help students understand the challenges of network security and why many network security measures are needed.  Vulnerabilities of the TCP/IP protocols occur at several layers.

 

 

2    Lab Environment

 

2.1   Environment Setup

 

Network Setup.    To conduct this lab, students need to run at least 3 connected (virtual) machines. One computer is used for attacking, the second computer is used as the victim, and the third computer is used as the observer. Students can set up 3 virtual machines on the same host computer, or they can set up 2 virtual machines, and then use the host computer as the third computer. For this lab, we put all these three machines on the same LAN, the configuration is described in the following (it is not necessary to use the exact same IP addresses show below):

 

Machine  1 Machine  2 Machine  3
192.168.0.122 192.168.0.123 192.168.0.124
| | |
|                   |                   |
| LAN or Virtual  Network |
| Gateway  192.168.0.1 |
|                                      |

|

Internet

 

You can copy/clone some VMs from the given one and run these VMs with multiple VMware player instances. To make these VMs connected, you need to put them all in the same subnet (e.g., 192.168.0.X) and with the same subnet mask (e.g., 255.255.255.0). You can change the network adapter setting of each VM and the network configuration inside the VM to do so (and you can use ifconfig command to know the actual assigned IP addresses).

 

 

Operating System.    This lab can be carried out using a variety of operating systems. Our pre-built virtual machine is based on Ubuntu  Linux, and all the tools needed for this lab are already installed.  If you prefer to use other Unix operating systems, such as Fedora, you should feel free to use them; however, some of the commands used in this lab description might not work or exist in other operating systems.

 

 

Netwox Tools.    We need tools to send out network packets of different types and with different contents. You can modify the spoofing program you have written in homework 1. Or we can also use Netwag to do that. However, the GUI interface of Netwag makes it difficult for us to automate our process. Therefore, we

 

 

 

 

strongly suggest that students use its command-line version, the Netwox command, which is the underlying command invoked by Netwag.

Netwox consists of a suite of tools, each having a specific number. You can run the command like the following (the parameters depend on which tool you are using). For some of the tool, you have to run it with the root privilege:

 

#  netwox  number [parameters … ]

 

If you are not sure how to set the parameters, you can look at the manual by issuing “netwox  number

–help”. You can also learn the parameter settings by running Netwag: for each command you execute from the graphic interface, Netwag actually invokes a corresponding Netwox command, and it displays the parameter settings. Therefore, you can simply copy and paste the displayed command.

 

 

Wireshark Tool.    You also need a good network-traffic sniffer tool for this lab.  Although Netwox comes with a sniffer, you will find that another tool called Wireshark is a much better sniffer tool. Both Netwox and Wireshark can be downloaded. If you are using our pre-built virtual machine, both tools are already installed. To sniff all the network traffic, both tools need to be run by the root.

 

 

Enabling  the ftp and telnet Servers.    For this lab, you may need to enable the ftp and telnet servers.  For the sake of security, these services are usually disabled by default.  To enable them in our pre-built Ubuntu virtual machine, you need to run the following commands as the root user:

 

Start the ftp server

#  service vsftpd start

 

Start the telnet  server

#  service  openbsd-inetd start

 

 

3    Lab Tasks

 

In this lab, you need to conduct attacks on the TCP/IP protocols.  You can use the Netwox tools and/or other tools (e.g., the one you build in your homework 1) in the attacks.

To simplify the “guess” of TCP sequence numbers and source port numbers, we assume that attacks are on the same physical network as the victims. Therefore, you can use sniffer tools to get that information. The following is the list of attacks that need to be implemented.

 

 

3.1   Task (1)  : Surveillance Techniques

 

Before launching attacks, attackers often use surveillance techniques to identify their targets.  They often choose those that are potentially vulnerable. In this lab, students will get familiar with two of the surveillance techniques:

 

  • Port Scanning: The objective of port scanning is to find out which ports on the target machine are open. Nmap is a popular software for port scanning, and it uses a variety of scanning methods, such as TCP connect scan, SYN stealth scan, FIN scan, Ping scan, UDP scan, IP Protocol scan, etc. Please try at least 5 techniques on a target machine, and report your observations.

 

 

 

 

  • Fingerprinting Operating Systems: The objective of OS fingerprinting is to find out what operating systems the target machine is running. OS fingerprinting is normally done by probing the differences in the implementation of the TCP/IP stack among operating systems. The differences include the handling of FIN, DON’T fragment bit, fragmentation, TCP ISN sampling, TCP options, etc. Please use Nmap to fingerprint Linux and Windows (if you also use Windows); report your observations.

 

 

3.2   Task (2)  : ARP cache poisoning

 

The ARP cache is an important part of the ARP protocol. Once a mapping between a MAC address and an IP address is resolved as the result of executing the ARP protocol, the mapping will be cached. Therefore, there is no need to repeat the ARP protocol if the mapping is already in the cache. However, because the ARP protocol is stateless, the cache can be easily poisoned by maliciously crafted ARP messages. Such an attack is called the ARP cache poisoning attack.

In such an attack, attackers use spoofed ARP messages to trick the victim to accept an invalid MAC-to- IP mapping, and store the mapping in its cache. There can be various types of consequences depending on the motives of the attackers. For example, attackers can launch a DoS attack against a victim by associating a nonexistent MAC address to the IP address of the victim’s default gateway; attackers can also redirect the traffic to and from the victim to another machine, etc.

In this task, you need to demonstrate how the ARP cache poisoning attack work.  Several commands can be useful in this task. In Linux we can use command arp to check the current mapping between IP address and MAC.

 

 

3.3   Task (3)  : SYN Flooding Attack

 

SYN flood is a form of DoS attack in which attackers send many SYN requests to a victim’s TCP port, but the attackers have no intention to finish the 3-way handshake procedure. Attackers either use spoofed IP address or do not continue the procedure. Through this attack, attackers can flood the victim’s queue that is used for half-opened connections, i.e. the connections that has finished SYN, SYN-ACK, but has not yet got a final ACK back. When this queue is full, the victim cannot take any more connection. Figure 1 illustrates the attack.

The size of the queue has a system-wide setting. In Linux, we can check the system queue size setting using the following command:

 

#  sysctl  -q net.ipv4.tcp_max_syn_backlog

 

We can use command “netstat  -na” to check the usage of the queue, i.e., the number of half- opened connection associated with a listening port.  The state for such connections is SYN-RECV. If the

3-way handshake is finished, the state of the connections will be ESTABLISHED.

In this task, you need to demonstrate the SYN flooding attack. You can use the Netwox tool to conduct the attack, and then use a sniffer tool to capture the attacking packets. While the attack is ongoing, run the “netstat  -na” command on the victim machine, and compare the result with that before the attack. Please also describe how you know whether the attack is successful or not.

 

 

SYN Cookie Countermeasure:   If your attack seems unsuccessful, one thing that you can investigate is whether the SYN cookie mechanism is turned on. SYN cookie is a defense mechanism to counter the SYN flooding attack. The mechanism will kick in if the machine detects that it is under the SYN flooding attack. You can use the sysctl command to turn on/off the SYN cookie mechanism:

 

 

 

ACK. The server is not able to process request from user.

 

 

 

 

Figure 1: SYN Flood

 

 

#  sysctl -a | grep cookie        (Display the  SYN cookie flag)

#  sysctl -w  net.ipv4.tcp_syncookies=0 (turn  off  SYN cookie)

#  sysctl -w  net.ipv4.tcp_syncookies=1 (turn  on     SYN cookie)

 

Please run your attacks with the SYN cookie mechanism on and off, and compare the results. In your report, please describe why the SYN cookie can effectively protect the machine against the SYN flooding attack. If your instructor does not cover the mechanism in the lecture, you can find how the SYN cookie mechanism works from the Internet.

 

 

3.4   Task (4)  : TCP RST Attacks on telnet and ssh Connections

 

The TCP RST Attack can terminate an established TCP connection between two victims. For example, if there is an established telnet connection (TCP) between two users A and B, attackers can spoof a RST packet from A to B, breaking this existing connection. To succeed in this attack, attackers need to correctly construct the TCP RST packet.

In this task, you need to launch an TCP RST attack to break an existing telnet connection between A and B. After that, try the same attack on an ssh connection. Please describe your observations. To simply the lab, we assume that the attackers and the victims are on the same LAN, i.e., attackers can observe the TCP traffic between A and B.

 

 

3.5   Task (5)  : TCP Session Hijacking

 

The objective of the TCP Session Hijacking attack is to hijack an existing TCP connection (session) between two victims by injecting malicious contents into this session.  If this connection is a telnet session, attackers can inject malicious commands into this session, causing the victims to execute the malicious commands. We will use telnet in this task. We also assume that the attackers and the victims are on the same LAN.

 

 

 

 

 

Normal TCP 3 way handshake and sending data between client and server

Attacker Hijack the TCP session and send data

“Z” to server on behalf of client

 

 

 

Figure 2: TCP Session Hijacking

 

 

Note:    If you use Wireshark to observe the network traffic, you should be aware that when Wireshark displays the TCP sequence number, by default, it displays the relative sequence number, which equals to the actual sequence number minus the initial sequence number. If you want to see the actual sequence number in a packet, you need to right click the TCP section of the Wireshark output, and select “Protocol Preference”. In the popup window, uncheck the “Relative  Sequence Number   and  Window Scaling” option.

 

 

3.6   Investigation

 

The level of difficulty in TCP attacks depends on a number of factors. Please investigate the following and write down your discoveries and observations in your report.

 

  • Study the pattern of the Initial Sequence Numbers (ISN), and answer whether the patterns are pre- dictable.

 

  • Study the TCP window size, and describe your observations.

 

  • Study the pattern of the source port numbers, and answer whether the patterns are predictable.

 

 

3.7   Note

 

It should be noted that because some vulnerabilities might have already been fixed in Linux, some of the above attacks might fail in Linux, but they could still be successful against other operating systems.

 

 

4    Homework Report

 

You should submit a report (remember to put your name and UIN in). The report should cover the following sections:

 

  • Design: The design of your attacks, including the attacking strategies, the packets that you use in your attacks, the tools that you used, etc.

 

 

 

 

  • Observation: Is your attack successful? How do you know whether it has succeeded or not? What do you expect to see? What have you observed? Is the observation a surprise to you?

 

  • Explanation: Some of the attacks might fail. If so, you need to find out what makes them fail. You can find the explanations from your own experiments (preferred) or from the Internet. If you get the explanation from the Internet, you still need to find ways to verify those explanations through your own experiments. You need to convince us that the explanations you get from the Internet can indeed explain your observations.

 

  • Defense thought: I encourage you to think hard on how to defend against this type of attacks after you understand the vulnerability.

 

 

References

 

[1] Netwox/Netwag   Guides,   by   Sridhar   Iyer.   http://courses.cse.tamu.edu/guofei/

csce465/netwox.pdf

 

[2] ICMP    attacks    against    TCP,    by    Gont,     F.    http://www.gont.com.ar/drafts/

icmp-attacks-against-tcp.html

 

[3] Slipping in the Window: TCP Reset attacks, by Paul A. Watson. http://osvdb.org/ref/04/

04030-SlippingInTheWindow_v1.0.doc

 

[4] Strange Attractors and  TCP/IP Sequence Number Analysis by  Zalewski. http://lcamtuf. coredump.cx/newtcp/

 

[5] Remote OS detection via TCP/IP Stack FingerPrinting by Fyodor, 1998. http://www.insecure. org/nmap/nmap-fingerprinting-article.html