Your cart is currently empty!
Solved–Assignment 3 –Solution
Problem 1 [25%] Suppose that I collected data for a group of machine learning students from last year. For each student, I have a feature X1 = hours studied for the class every week, X2 = overall GPA, and Y = whether the student receives ˆ ˆ ˆ = 1.0. an A. We fit a…
Description
Problem 1 [25%]
Suppose that I collected data for a group of machine learning students from last year. For each student, I have a feature X1 = hours studied for the class every week, X2 = overall GPA, and Y = whether the student receives
|
ˆ |
ˆ |
ˆ |
= 1.0. |
|
an A. We fit a logistic regression model and produce estimated coefficients, β0 |
= −6, β1 |
= −0.1, β2 |
-
Estimate the probability of getting an A for a student who studies for 40h and has an undergrad GPA of 2.0
-
By how much would the student in part 1 need to improve their GPA or adjust time studied to have a 90% chance of getting an A in the class? Is that likely?
Problem 2 [25%]
Consider a classification problem with two classes T (true) and F (false). Then, suppose that you have the following four prediction models:
-
T: The classifier predicts T for each instance (always)
-
F: The classifier predicts F for each instance (always)
-
C: The classifier predicts the correct label always (100% accuracy)
-
W: The classifier predicts the wrong label always (0% accuracy)
You also have a test set with 60% instances labeled T and 40% instances labeled F. Now, compute the following statistics for each one of your algorithms:
Statistic Cls. T Cls. F Cls. C Cls. W
recall
true positive rate
false positive rate
true negative rate
specificity
precision
Some of the rows above may be the same.
Problem O2 [30%]
This problem can be substituted for Problem 2 above, for up to 5 points extra credit. The better score from problems 2 and O2 will be considered.
Solve Exercise 3.4 in [Bishop, C. M. (2006). Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning].
1
In this problem, you will derive the bias-variance decomposition of MSE as described in Eq. (2.7) in ISL. Let
-
be the true model, fˆ be the estimated model. Consider fixed instance x0 with the label y0 = f(x0). For simplicity, assume that Var[ ] = 0, in which case the decomposition becomes:
-
E h(y0 − fˆ(x0))2i = Var[fˆ(x0)]
+
E[f(x0) − fˆ(x0)]
2
.
|
{z
}
|
{z
}
| {z }
test MSE
Prove that this equality holds.
Hints:
Variance Bias
1. You may find the following decomposition of variance helpful:
Var[W ] = E (W − E[W ])2 = E W 2 − E[W ]2
2. This link could be useful: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Variance#Basic_properties
Problem 4 [25%]
Please help me. I wrote the following code that computes the MSE, bias, and variance for a test point.
set.seed(1984)
population <- data.frame(year=seq(1790,1970,10),pop=c(uspop)) population.train <- population[1:nrow(population) – 1,] population.test <- population[nrow(population),]
E <- c() # prediction errors of the different models for(i in 1:10){
pop.lm <- lm(pop ~ year, data = dplyr::sample_n(population.train, 8))
e <- predict(pop.lm, population.test) – population.test$pop
E <- c(E,e)
}
cat(glue::glue(“MSE: {mean(E^2)}\n”,
“Bias^2: {mean(E)^2}\n”,
“Var: {var(E)}\n”,
“Bias^2+Var: {mean(E)^2 + var(E)}”))
|
## MSE: |
2869.61343086216 |
|
|
## Bias^2: |
2681.61281912074 |
|
|
## |
Var: |
208.889568601581 |
|
## |
Bias^2+Var: |
2890.50238772232 |
I expected that the MSE would be equal to Biasˆ2 + Variance, but that does not seem to be the case. The MSE is 2402.515 and Biasˆ2 + Variance is 2428.706. Was my assumption wrong or is there a bug in my code? Is it a problem that I am computing the expectation only over 10 trials?
Hint: If you are using Python and need help with this problem, please come to see me (Marek).
2
Related products
-
Project One: Top of Pile Solution
$35.00$24.00 -
Lab 7: Multithreaded Numerical Integration Solution
$35.00$24.00 -
Homework 2: Path Network Navigation SOlution
$35.00$24.00 -
Project 5: Subdivision Surfaces
$35.00$24.00 -
Project Nested Circles Solution
$35.00$24.00